Comparison
Flo pret Stardust 2026: Privātums, Funkcijas un Cenas Salīdzinātas
Our verdict
Flo was caught sharing data with Google and Meta. Stardust marketed privacy after Roe v. Wade but was found by Privacy International to send data to servers and use third-party de-identification. Neither delivers the privacy it promises. PinkyBloom needs no account, has no ads, and never sells your data.
Flo vs Stardust vs PinkyBloom
| Feature | Flo | Stardust | PinkyBloom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$49.99/yr premium | Free | Free |
| Users | 440M+ | Millions (post-Dobbs surge) | Growing |
| Data storage | Cloud (Flo servers) | Cloud (de-identified via Rownd) | Stored on your phone |
| Privacy track record | Class action settled 2025; Flo paid $8M | Voluntary law enforcement cooperation | Never sold, no ads; partner sharing end-to-end encrypted |
| AI assistant | Cloud-based chatbot | Built-in AI assistant (Pinky) | |
| Voice logging | |||
| Mood forecasts | |||
| Astrology features | Astrology-themed insights | ||
| Account required | Email required | Google account required | No account needed |
| Safety Mode | Anonymous Mode (still cloud) | ||
| Doctor visit reports | |||
| Ads | Ads in free tier | No ads | No ads ever |
Overview
Flo un Stardust ieņem pretējās periodu izsekošanas spektra galus zīmola pozicionēšanā. Flo ir nostiprināts tirgus līderis — 440 miljoni lietotāju, visaptverošas funkcijas un korporatīva veselības platformas pieeja. Stardust ir post-Dobbs privātuma izaicinātājs — mazāka lietotne, kas pēc Augstākās tiesas lēmuma strauji pieauga lejupielādēs, reklamējot sevi kā privātuma pirmajā vietā esošu periodu izsekošanas lietotni ar astroloģijas tēmas ieskatiem.
Flo piedāvā dziļumu: AI čatbots, 70+ simptomi, kopienas forumi, grūtniecības režīms un saturs no 120+ medicīnas ekspertiem. Stardust piedāvā diferenciāciju: astroloģijas sajauktas cikla ieskati un privātuma ziņojumi, kas rezonēja ar lietotājiem, kuri pēkšņi bija noraizējušies par savu menstruālo datu drošību.
Ironija ir tāda, ka neviena lietotne nesniedz privātumu. Stardust privātuma apgalvojumi neizturēja neatkarīgu izmeklēšanu. Lietotājiem, kuriem rūp reproduktīvā datu privātums — īpaši post-Dobbs vidē — neviena lietotne nesniedz arhitektūras aizsardzību.
Privacy comparison
The privacy comparison between Flo and Stardust is a case study in two different kinds of failure.
Flo's data sharing is documented in an FTC complaint and a federal class action. Menstrual data went to Google, Meta, and analytics firms. Flo paid $8M to settle in 2025, admitting nothing. A California jury found Meta liable for eavesdropping. Flo did the thing everyone fears a period tracker will do.
Stardust positioned itself as the antidote to Flo's failures. After the Dobbs decision, it marketed privacy and surged in downloads. But in June 2022, Vice/Motherboard discovered Stardust's privacy policy stated it would cooperate with law enforcement "whether or not legally required" — meaning voluntary handover of menstrual data to police. Stardust changed the wording only after press inquiry.
Then in May 2025, Privacy International revealed deeper issues: Stardust sends data to servers and relies on Rownd, a third-party de-identification service. A Google account is required, linking your menstrual data to Google's identity ecosystem. De-identification is a process, not a guarantee — academic research shows menstrual data can be re-identified with few data points.
PinkyBloom needs no account and never sells your data. Your cycle log is stored on your phone, with no third-party de-identification services. Safety Mode swaps neutral data into what she shares with a partner.
Features and intelligence
Flo's feature set dwarfs Stardust's. AI chatbot, 70+ symptoms, community forums, pregnancy mode, and thousands of articles. Flo is a comprehensive health platform.
Stardust's main differentiator is astrology-themed cycle insights — connecting your cycle to astrological concepts. The tracking itself is basic: cycle predictions and symptom logging. For users who enjoy the astrology angle, it's engaging. For users who want health intelligence, it's limited.
PinkyBloom provides genuine AI intelligence. Pinky, the built-in AI assistant, handles health conversations, voice logging captures symptoms naturally, mood forecasts predict emotional patterns, and doctor visit reports create professional summaries. It's the substance that both Flo's chatbot and Stardust's astrology insights point toward.
Pricing comparison
Flo charges ~$49.99/year for premium; its free tier has ads. Stardust is free with no ads.
Both apps store data in the cloud. Flo monetizes through subscriptions and (historically) advertising partnerships. Stardust's monetization model is less clear, but the Google account requirement and server-side data processing suggest data plays a role.
PinkyBloom is free. No ads, no Google account linkage. The total cost is $0.
There's a better option
Flo betrayed user trust with documented data sharing. Stardust promised privacy but relies on servers and third-party de-identification. PinkyBloom has no accounts to identify you, no ads, and never sells your data. Safety Mode replaces her shared status with neutral data, which neither app offers.
